How to choose which lure types to stock
Choose types by the spread inside them, not by the headline price of one listing.
- Our sample's tightest type band is hard lure at US$1.85-3.20 per piece; the widest is spoon and spinner at US$0.31-6.00.
- MOQ floors differ by type: 20 pieces on rods, 100 on hard lures, 500 to 2,000 on the cheapest hook and VIB rows.
- US outings rose 3% to 918 million in 2025 while headcount fell from 57.9 to 57 million - consumables follow visits, durables follow people.
The type is a shelf decision; the form is the product decision
Our catalog is filed by type - twelve of them, from soft lures to fishing accessories. A type is a good unit for planning a shelf. It is a bad unit for placing an order, because a type name can cover several moulds that share nothing but a word.
The number that tells you which is which is the width of the band, not its position.
| Type | Sampled listings | Reference band | Width | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hard lure | 6 | US$1.85-3.20 | 1.7x | One product with a stable cost. The decision is specification, not price. |
| Metal jig | 5 | US$0.97-2.01 | 2.1x | Same: a lead body and a finish. Differentiate on weight and hook. |
| Minnow | 6 | US$0.37-3.17 | 8.6x | Length, section count and color count are three different products. |
| Soft lure | 6 | US$0.20-3.85 | 19x | Four moulds under one word. |
| Spoon and spinner | 6 | US$0.31-6.00 | 19x | An assembly against a stamping, plus per-bag units. |
| Octopus skirt | 3 | US$0.08-2.80 | 35x | Three builds, distinguished entirely by the head. |
Wide bands are not volatility. They are category failure - several products filed under one name.
Consumables follow visits; durables follow people
The US participation data is the background a first range is launched into: 57 million anglers in 2025, down from 57.9 million, while outings rose 3% to 918 million. Headcount fell and visits rose.
That split decides what a first order should be weighted towards:
| If you sell | Demand follows | What that means for a first range |
|---|---|---|
| Soft plastics, hooks, terminal tackle | Outings | The segment that grew. Consumables are replaced, so a customer returns. |
| Rods, reels, hard baits | Headcount | The segment that was flat. Higher unit value, longer replacement cycle. |
For most first ranges the honest weighting is towards consumables, with one or two durable types carried as the reason a customer visits at all.
What the trade rewarded, and how to read it
At ICAST 2026, soft plastics took both soft-lure categories, the urchin form took two more, and electronics went to live sonar. That list is a shortlist of categories to examine, not a forecast - it is a design judgement by retailers and press, not a sales figure.
Two categories from that list are developed enough on this site to act on: urchin baits and live-sonar lure design.
A workable first-range shape
- Pick two or three types, not six. Use the width table above: start where the band is narrow enough that you can specify the product.
- Cover two or three forms inside each type. This is what the wide-band types are for - a fork-tail and a paddle-tail are two products to the same customer.
- Weight towards consumables, because they follow outings and outings grew.
- Check the MOQ floor against your cash, not against the unit price. Rods start at 20 pieces because the unit value supports it; the cheapest hooks need 2,000.
- Decide whether saltwater is in scope, because it changes the hardware specification rather than the product list.
Where to go next
- Starting a private label lure brand
- How to read a catalog - which field decides the price in each family
- Reference price bands
- The Chinese tackle industry - which cluster makes which family
- Send a specification
